FLORIDA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED,HOWRAH vs. C.I.T KOLKATA - I, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2414/KOL/2013Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 January 2016AY 2008-092 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity to represent its case due to the insufficient time provided. Therefore, the order passed by the CIT under Section 263 was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee received a show cause notice under Section 263 on a Saturday for a hearing on Monday. Due to the short notice, the assessee could not arrange for representation before the CIT.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT provided a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee before passing an order under Section 263.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Shri N.Vasudevan , & Shri M. Balaganesh

This appeal of the assessee arises out of the Order of the Learned CIT, Kol-I, Kolkata dated 26.3.2013 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) against the order of assessment framed by the Learned AO u/s 143(3) of the Act.

2.

The first ground raised by the assessee is not allowing reasonable opportunity by the ld. CIT to the assessee to represent its case u/s. 263 proceedings.

3.

We find from the material available on record that a show cause notice u/s. 263 of the Act was served on the assessee on 23/03/2013 (being Saturday) and the hearing was fixed on 25-03-2013 ( i.e. Monday) at 10.30A.M. The assessee could not contact its Chartered Accountant to represent its case within the short span of time. Ultimately, the ld. CIT passed an order u/s. 263 of the Act on 26-03-2013 setting aside the order of assessment passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act.

1 M/s. Florida Towers Pvt. Ltd

4.

We have heard the rival submissions. We find that none appeared on behalf of the assessee before the ld.CIT due to paucity of time. Thus, the ld.AR of the assessee pleaded before us that one more opportunity of hearing be given to the assessee to represent its case before the ld.CIT. In response to this, the ld.CIT/DR fairly conceded to the same. In these circumstances and in view of the undisputed facts as stated hereinabove with regard to paucity of time to represent the case before the ld. CIT, we deem it fit and appropriate, in the interest of justice and fair play, to set aside the order of the ld.CIT passed u/s. 263 of the Act for de novo adjudication. Hence, the order of the ld.CIT is set aside. Since the appeal is disposed of by setting aside the order of the ld.CIT u/s. 263, we refrain to go into merits of the other grounds raised by the assessee before us.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as stated above. THIS ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 19 -01-2016

Sd/- Sd/- ( N. Vasudevan, Judicial Member ) (M. Balaganesh, Accountant Member)

Date 19 -01/2016 Copy of the order forwarded to:- .1 The Appellant: M/s. Florida Towers Private Limited 493B, G.T Road (S), Shibpur, Howrah-711102.

The Respondent: Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Kolkata, Aaykar Bhawan 2 P-7 Chowringhee Sq. Kol-69. 3 /The CIT, 4.The CIT(A)

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →