M/S. DECENTRALISED PARTICIPATORY PROGRAM,HARIDWAR vs. ADDL.CIT, BULANDSHAHR

However, at the time of hearing, an adjournment petition was moved seeking time. The appeal was passed over. In the second round, a counsel appeared who was required to address why the defects pointed out by the Registry on 23.04.2014 remains uncured. The person stated that he was a proxy counsel and was unable to address the issue. In the absence of any explanation it was indicated that the appeal of the assessee would be dismissed in limine. The proxy counsel stated that he had nothing further to state. The record shows that the appeal came up for hearing on 15.07.2015 on which date though a Paper Book was filed but the defect pointed out by the Registry remained not cured. In the circumstances the adjournment petition was dismissed granting liberty to the assessee that in case it was serious in pursuing the appeal then an appropriate petition praying for a recall of this order could be moved carrying out the necessary action