I.T.O WD - 54(4),KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SMT INDRANI CHATTERJEE (DECASED) L/H,SOUMITRA MOOKHERJEE, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an assessment cannot be framed on a deceased person without bringing the legal heirs on record as per Section 159 of the Income Tax Act. Since this procedure was not followed, the assessment was invalid.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Officer framed an assessment for AY 2005-06 on Smt. Indrani Chatterjee. However, the assessee had passed away on April 5, 2009, prior to the assessment order being passed on December 31, 2010.
What were the issues?
Whether an assessment framed on a deceased assessee without substituting the legal heirs is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Mahavir Singh, JM & Shri Waseem Ahmed, AM]
Per Shri Mahavir Singh, JM:
This appeal by revenue is arising out of order of CIT(A)-XXXVI, Kolkata vide Appeal No. 599/CIT(A)-XXXVI/Kol/37/Wd-54(4)/10-11 dated 17.12.2012. Assessment was framed by ITO, Wd-54(4), Kolkata u/s. 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2005-06 vide his order dated 31.12.2010.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the assessment was framed on a dead person and this fact is recorded by AO in his assessment order at page 1 last para, which reads as under: “As per Inspector’s report it revealed that Smt. Indrani Chatterjee, the assessee, has died long before and the said property i.e. flat no. A-202, 7/1A, Sunny Park, Kolkata-19 is now under the possession of Sri Soumitra Mukherjee, stated to be the nephew of the deceased, now living at Delhi.”
According to Ld. Counsel, the assessment was framed u/s. 147/144 of the Act dated 31.12.2010 but the assessee died on 05.04.2009. According to him, this assessment has rightly been quashed by CIT(A) on this ground also. When this fact was referred to Ld. Sr. DR, he relied on the assessment order only. 4. We have heard rival submissions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case. We find that the assessee Indrani Chatterjee died on 05.04.2009 and assessment was framed on a dead person and legal heirs are not brought on record by substituting in term of section 159 of the Act. Once this is the position the assessment is to be made in the hands of late Indrani Smt. Indrani Chatterjee, AY 2005-06 Chattejee although through legal heirs by adopting the procedure prescribed u/s. 159 of the Act. The AO has not gone into this aspect despite the fact that he was informed that assessee Late Indrani Chatterjee has already expired on 05.04.2009 during the pendency of this assessment proceedings. In term of the facts and circumstances, the assessment of the deceased person can be assessed by adopting the procedure prescribed u/s.159 of the Act. The revenue, if law permits, can take action on legal heirs to make the assessment after adopting the procedure prescribed u/s. 159 of the Act. Accordingly, this legal issue is deciding in favour of the assessee and the appeal of revenue is dismissed.
In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026