SAVITARTH FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that a subsequent CBDT circular extended the time limit for filing such applications and allowed those rejected solely on time to file fresh applications. Therefore, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the rejection of its application for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The rejection was due to the application being filed beyond the prescribed time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is maintainable given the subsequent CBDT circular providing relief for time-barred applications for Section 80G registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “ C ” BENCH
Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R Senthil Kumar
आदेश/ORDER
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee as against the rejection order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad for final registration u/s.80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Savitarth Foundation vs. CIT(E) Asst.Year N.A 2
The Ld.Counsel for the assesee filed a letter requesting to withdraw the above appeal which reads as follows:
The appellant had filed the appeal on 21.02.2024 against the rejection of registration u / s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) in case of Savitarth Foundation. The application for registration was rejected as the same was not filed within the time limit prescribed in the and the same has been rejected as non-maintainable. Thereafter, CBDT has issued the Circular No. 7/2024 dated 25.04.2024 extending the time limit to file the application for registration u / s 80G of the Act. Further, those applicants, whose registration has been rejected solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date, have been granted the relief by allowing them to file the fresh application on or before 30.06.2024. Copy of the Circular No. 7/2024 dated 25.04.2024 is enclosed herewith. As the relief sought from the Hon’ble Tribunal stands covered by the Circular no.07/2024, dated 25.04.2024, the Appellant hereby requests your permission to withdraw the appeal filed in Savitarth Foundation vide I.T.A No.316/Ahd/2024.
Recording the above submission, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026