GREENWAYS AIR & TRAVEL P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (ITDS) 1(4), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4226/MUM/2014Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 February 2016AY 2008-093 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was not given adequate opportunity to furnish details and explanations. Therefore, the matter was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice for short deduction of TDS and passed an order treating the assessee as a defaulter on the same day without providing an opportunity to explain. The assessee appealed, arguing a lack of natural justice.

What were the issues?

Whether the AO's order under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) was passed without adhering to principles of natural justice by not providing an opportunity to the assessee to explain the short deduction of TDS.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 201(1),Section 201(1A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR

Hearing: 02.02.2016Pronounced: 10.02.2016

O R D E R

PER C.N. PRASAD, JM:

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-9, Mumbai dated 03.03.2014 pertaining to assessment year 2008-09.

2.

The assessee challenges the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the order passed by the AO u/s. 201(1) & 201 (1A) of the Act.

3.

In the first ground the assessee challenges the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the order passed by the AO is devoid of natural justice as assessee has not given any opportunity to rebut or not provided time to file details regarding shortfall envisaged in the order passed u/s. 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act.

4.

The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submits that the AO issued notice u/s. 201(1) on 30.3.2011 stating that there is a short deduction of TDS and required the assessee to explain or clarify the position in this regard. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submits that on the very same day the AO passed order u/s. 201(1) and 201(1A) treating the assessee as default for short deduction of tax.

5.

The assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) specifically raising the ground that the AO had never given an opportunity to the assessee to furnish the details/explanations with respect to the notice issued u/s. 201 of the Act. However, the Ld. CIT(A) passed order without appreciating the submissions of the assessee. Therefore, he requested that the matter may be sent back to the AO for providing adequate opportunity to the assessee.

6.

The Ld. Departmental Representative has no serious objection in sending back the matter to the AO.

7.

On hearing both the sides, we are of the considered view that the matter has to go back to the AO for fresh adjudication and the AO shall provide adequate opportunity to the assessee to furnish the details/explanation required by the AO. Thus, we restore this matter to the file of the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh in accordance with law.

8.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 10th February, 2016.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →