NIPHA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. CIT-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that a fresh order had been passed by the Assessing Officer which was not detrimental to the assessee. Therefore, the appeal against the CIT's order had become infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT under section 263. The Assessing Officer subsequently passed a fresh order under section 143(3) read with section 263.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal against the CIT's revisionary order is maintainable when a subsequent order by the AO has rendered it infructuous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
Per Shri P.M. Jagtap :- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-I, Kolkata dated 26.03.2014 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
At the time of hearing before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the Assessing Officer has already passed a fresh order under section 143(3) read with section 263 in pursuance of the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT under section 263 and since the said order ./2014 Assessment year: 2009-2010 Page 2 of 2 passed by the Assessing Officer is not detrimental to the assessee, this appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT under section 263 has virtually become infructuous, which the assessee wants to withdraw. Accordingly, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on February 23, 2016.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026