M/S COMPUTER SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS P. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 22.07.2013 of CIT(A)-VI, New Delhi pertaining to 2010-11 assessment year on various grounds.

However, at the time of hearing, an adjournment was moved on behalf of Mr. Ravi Gupta, Adv. seeking time. The record shows that no Power of Attorney has been issued in favour of the said Ld. AR. The counsel appearing in support of the petition stated that Power of Attorney has not been executed in Mr. Ravi Gupta’s name and would be filed within a few days. A perusal of the record shows that the appeal first came up for hearing on 13.03.2014 on which occasion it was adjourned as the assessee was not present. Thereafter the appeal came up for hearing on 11.08.2014; 29.12.2014; 29.01.2015 & 13.05.2015 and on each of these occasions it was adjourned on the request of the assessee. It is further seen that the defect pointed out by the Registry on I.T.A .No.-5314/Del/2013