M/S. H.M.G. BULK CARRIER,MEERUT vs. CIT, MEERUT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the subsequent order of the CIT(A) rendered the present appeal infructuous. Since the assessee did not wish to pursue the matter further, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act. Subsequently, the CIT(A) passed another order which decided all issues in favor of the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal challenging the invocation of Section 263 has become infructuous due to a subsequent favorable order from the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S.V. MEHROTRASHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal by the assessee has been filed against the order of the CIT(A), Meerut dated 3.2.2012 passed u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act 1961 [for short, ‘the Act’] for AY 2007-08.
At the very outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted a copy of the order of the CIT(A), Meerut dated 8.5.2015 and submitted that the present appeal has become infructuous in view of the order of the CIT(A) [supra] wherein all the issues raised by the assessee against the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act have been decided in favour of the assessee.
The ld. DR fairly and candidly accepted that the appeal of the assessee against reassessment order passed in pursuant to order u/s 263 of the Act has been allowed in favour of the assessee.
In view of the above submissions of both the sides, we are of the considered opinion that the appeal challenging the invocation of provisions of section 263 of the Act have become infructuous and since the assessee is not willing to agitate the issue any further, the present appeal having become infructuous, stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as having become infructuous. The decision is pronounced in the open court on 24.09.2015.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026