NIPUN STEEL PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3853/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 September 2015AY 2007-083 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The ITAT held that the CIT(A) is obligated to decide an appeal on merits, even if the assessee does not appear. Dismissing an appeal in limine for want of representation is not in accordance with the law.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed in limine for non-appearance, despite a legally valid appeal being filed. The assessment had initially involved an addition of Rs. 5 lac under Section 68.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal in limine for non-appearance of the assessee, or if the appeal must be decided on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC-I : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Goel, CA
For Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR
Hearing: 29.09.2015Pronounced: 29.09.2015

(Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Saurabh Goel, CA Respondent by: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 29.09.2015 Date of Pronouncement: 29.09.2015 ORDER

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) on 22.4.2014 in relation to the Assessment Year 2007-08.

2.

I have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is noticed that the assessment in this case was completed making addition for a sum of Rs.5 lac u/s 68 of the Act.

The assessee preferred appeal against the assessment order. Certain notices were issued, but, the assessee did not appear. As such, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal in limine. In my considered opinion, the course of action adopted by the ld. CIT(A) is not in accordance with law. Once a legally valid appeal is filed, CIT(A) is obliged to pass order on merits even if the assessee chooses not to participate in the appellate proceedings. In no circumstance the first appellate authority can dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine for want of representation. As the ld. CIT(A) has not disposed of the appeal on merits, I set aside the impugned order and restore the matter to his file for disposal of the appeal on merits, after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →