NIPUN STEEL PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) is obligated to decide an appeal on merits, even if the assessee does not appear. Dismissing an appeal in limine for want of representation is not in accordance with the law.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed in limine for non-appearance, despite a legally valid appeal being filed. The assessment had initially involved an addition of Rs. 5 lac under Section 68.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal in limine for non-appearance of the assessee, or if the appeal must be decided on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC-I : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL
(Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Saurabh Goel, CA Respondent by: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 29.09.2015 Date of Pronouncement: 29.09.2015 ORDER
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) on 22.4.2014 in relation to the Assessment Year 2007-08.
I have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is noticed that the assessment in this case was completed making addition for a sum of Rs.5 lac u/s 68 of the Act.
The assessee preferred appeal against the assessment order. Certain notices were issued, but, the assessee did not appear. As such, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal in limine. In my considered opinion, the course of action adopted by the ld. CIT(A) is not in accordance with law. Once a legally valid appeal is filed, CIT(A) is obliged to pass order on merits even if the assessee chooses not to participate in the appellate proceedings. In no circumstance the first appellate authority can dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine for want of representation. As the ld. CIT(A) has not disposed of the appeal on merits, I set aside the impugned order and restore the matter to his file for disposal of the appeal on merits, after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026