M/S. DEPENDABLE TRANSPORT PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2309/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 October 2015AY 2006-072 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the assessee had no exempt income during the year, the provisions of Section 14A were not applicable. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not justified.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed an addition of Rs. 79,845 made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The assessee contended that no exempt income was earned during the assessment year.

What were the issues?

Applicability of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act when no exempt income has been earned by the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.C. GUPTA

For Appellant: Shri Surender Kumar, CA
For Respondent: Shri Amrit Lal, DR
Hearing: 21.09.2015Pronounced: 05.10.2015

ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2006-07 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XXV, New Delhi dated 6th January, 2014.

2.

The only ground of appeal of the assessee is as under:- “That the order dated 16-01-2014 passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) XXV, New Delhi is against law and facts on the file in as much as he was not justified to uphold the action of the learned Asstt Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-13, New Delhi in making addition of additional sum of Rs.79,845/- by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read together with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 on account of expenses incurred for earning exempt income.”

2 ITA-2309/Del/2014

3.

Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the only addition in this case was of `79,845/-. He submitted that there was no exempt income during the year and therefore, the provisions of Section 14A do not apply. He referred to Schedule-9 of the audited account filed with the Assessing Officer wherein there was no exempt income.

4.

Learned DR could not controvert the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee.

5.

I have considered the rival submissions and have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and the learned CIT(A). It is an admitted fact that there was no exempt income earned by the assessee as is also evident from Schedule-9 of the accounts and, therefore, the provisions of Section 14A were not applicable to the case of the assessee. Accordingly, the ground of appeal

of the assessee is allowed.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →