M/S. DEPENDABLE TRANSPORT PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee had no exempt income during the year, the provisions of Section 14A were not applicable. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an addition of Rs. 79,845 made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The assessee contended that no exempt income was earned during the assessment year.
What were the issues?
Applicability of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act when no exempt income has been earned by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.C. GUPTA
ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2006-07 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XXV, New Delhi dated 6th January, 2014.
The only ground of appeal of the assessee is as under:- “That the order dated 16-01-2014 passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) XXV, New Delhi is against law and facts on the file in as much as he was not justified to uphold the action of the learned Asstt Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-13, New Delhi in making addition of additional sum of Rs.79,845/- by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read together with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 on account of expenses incurred for earning exempt income.”
2 ITA-2309/Del/2014
Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the only addition in this case was of `79,845/-. He submitted that there was no exempt income during the year and therefore, the provisions of Section 14A do not apply. He referred to Schedule-9 of the audited account filed with the Assessing Officer wherein there was no exempt income.
Learned DR could not controvert the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee.
I have considered the rival submissions and have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and the learned CIT(A). It is an admitted fact that there was no exempt income earned by the assessee as is also evident from Schedule-9 of the accounts and, therefore, the provisions of Section 14A were not applicable to the case of the assessee. Accordingly, the ground of appeal
of the assessee is allowed.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026