M/S. TOFFEE AGRICULTURAL FARMS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay, finding the explanation for the delay to be satisfactory. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh de novo appellate order.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a significant delay of 410 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to their tax counsel failing to file the appeal as instructed.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT should be condoned.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.C. GUPTA & SHRI SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI SHRI SHRI
PER G.C. GUPTA PER G.C. GUPTA, VP PER G.C. GUPTA PER G.C. GUPTA , VP , VP : , VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2007-08 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XIX, New Delhi dated 20th January, 2012.
There is a delay of 410 days in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed a condonation of delay application and also a duly sworn affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay. Learned DR has opposed the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee regarding the issue of condonation of delay.
We have heard the rival submissions with regard to the issue of condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. We find that from the contents of the condonation of delay application and the 2 ITA-3595/Del/2013 duly sworn affidavit of Shri Prashant Sahni, director of the assessee company, it is clear that the assessee company has instructed its tax counsel to file an appeal before the ITAT but the appeal was not filed by the said counsel and the assessee came to know of these facts only on 6th May, 2013 and, as a result, had to change its tax counsel so as to file the appeal before the ITAT. In these facts of the case, we are of the view that it is a fit case for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. Accordingly, the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned and the issues in the grounds of appeal of the assessee are restored to the file of the learned CIT(A) to pass a de novo appellate order in accordance with law after allowing due opportunity of hearing to both the parties. We direct accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 5th October, 2015.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026