STANDARD FIBRECHEM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR 1(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4764/MUM/2012Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 February 2016AY 2008-092 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer (AO) for verification. The AO is directed to examine the assessee's accounts to determine if the interest expenditure was solely for trading or also for investments.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed interest expenditure, which the Revenue disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(ii) for earning tax-exempt income. The assessee contended the interest was for trading activities, not investments, while the Revenue was unsure.

What were the issues?

Whether interest expenditure was incurred for trading activities or investments, and the genuineness of such expenditure, for the purpose of disallowance under Section 14A.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI SANJAY GARG

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopal, A.R
For Respondent: Shri K.L. Kanak, D.R
Hearing: 22.09.2015Pronounced: 03.02.2016

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 05.06.2012 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2008-09.

2.

The short issue raised in this appeal is relating to the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 14A read with rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Income Tax Rules incurred for earning the tax exempt income by the assessee. The stand of the assessee is that no interest expenditure has been incurred in relation to investments. The interest expenditure has been incurred by the assessee in relation to trading activity in shares and not in relation to the investments whereas the stand of the Revenue is that from the records it is not clear that the interest expenditure has been incurred in relation to trading activity only. 2 M/s. Standard Fibrechem Pvt. Ltd.

3.

Both the Ld. Representatives of the parties submitted that the issue may be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the AO) for verification of the facts as to whether the interest expenditure was incurred by the assessee in relation to the trading activity in shares only or in respect of investments also and also to verify the genuineness of the said expenditure. We, accordingly, restore this issue to the file of the AO in the terms as indicated above and direct the AO to examine the accounts of the assessee and give a definite finding whether the interest expenditure was incurred in relation to trading activity only or in respect of investments also and to decide the issue in accordance with law.

4.

With the above observations, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 03.02.2016.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →