ADIT (IT) 1(1), MUMBAI vs. ASIA TODAY LTD( OLD), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to interest on TDS from the first day of the assessment year, even if TDS certificates were filed late, provided the tax was deducted and deposited on time. This decision followed the jurisdictional High Court's ruling.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed TDS credit in its return of income. The Assessing Officer (AO) allowed the TDS credit but granted interest under section 244A from the date of submission of TDS certificates, not from the beginning of the assessment year. The assessee contended that interest should be granted from April 1, 2005.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under section 244A is allowable from the date of submission of TDS certificates or from the beginning of the assessment year when tax was deducted and deposited on time.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pc.CIT Vs. State Bank of India (2019) 261 Taxman 409 (bom). 5. Ajanta Manufacturing Ltd. v. DCIT13 citing330 ITR 340 · 2011 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJENDRA & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
आदेश ORDER अिमत शु�ला : �या. स.: PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM: At the outset, the Ld. DR has pointed out that, both the appeals have been filed against same order dated 30.09.2013 passed by the CIT(A)-X, Mumbai for the quantum of assessment passed under section 154 for the assessment year 2005-06. That is, both the appeals are identical filed against the order, therefore, one appeal should be treated as infructuous. Accordingly, is dismissed as infructuous.
ए�शया टूड़े �ल�मटेड 2 M/s Asia Today Ltd (NEW) ITA No. 1379/Mum/2
The only ground raised by the revenue in challenging the impugned order dated 30.09.2013 reads as under:-
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, whether the ld. DIT(A) was correct in holding that interest under section 244A of the I T Act, 1961 is to be allowed to assessee for period for which the assessee was not able to produce original TDS certificates for substantiating its claim in the return of income filed even when the default was on part of the assessee and therefore, no interest was allowable for the aforesaid period”.
At the outset, both the parties admitted that this issue stands covered by the decision of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd, reported in [2011] 330 ITR 340. This order has been followed by the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2004-05 vide order dated 23.12.2015 in ITA No. 4236/Mum/2014.
After considering the aforesaid submissions and on perusal of the impugned order, we find that the only issue relates to granting of interest under section 244A, whether it should be granted from the date of submission of certificate or from the first day of assessment year. The assessee’s case is that AO ought to have granted interest w.e.f. 1.4.2005 as refund due to the assessee which was on account of tax deducted and credited to the Government account by the deductor. The AO however in his order passed under section 154 on 12.04.2014 gave the TDS credit of Rs. 53,97,949/- and allowed interest under section 244A from the date of submission of the TDS certificates. In the return of income filed on 31.10.2005, the assessee had claimed TDS credit of Rs. 1,43,56,403/- and therefore, contended that it is eligible for interest from the 1st April, 2005 itself. The Tribunal in assesee’s own case for the AY 2004-05 following the decision of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd (supra) decided the issue in the following manner:- 4. We find that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (supra) has categorically held that the ए�शया टूड़े �ल�मटेड 3 M/s Asia Today Ltd (NEW) TDS due to the assessee even if the TDS certificates have been filed late if the tax was deducted and deposited with the exchequer in time, the interest has to be granted to the assessee from 1st day of assessment year in accordance with Section 244A of the Act and not from the date of filing of TDS certificates with the Revenue. The facts in the instant appeal before us are identical to the facts before Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Larsen and Toubro Limited(supra) and the Revenue has not contradicted the same before us . Respectfully following the same, we reject the contentions of the Revenue and dismiss this appeal by directing the AO to grant interest on refund due to the assessee company on account of excess TDS claim w.e.f. 01.04.2004 and not from the date of submissions of TDS certificates by the assessee company in the light of our above decision stated above strictly in accordance with the decision of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Larsen and Toubro Limited(supra). We order accordingly.
Thus, following the aforesaid reasoning and the binding judicial precedence of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court, we decide this issue in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Accordingly, the sole ground raised by the department stands dismissed.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 8th March, 2016.
Sd/- Sd/- (राज�) (अिमत शु�ला) लेखा सद�य �याईक सद�य (RAJENDRA) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Date: 8th March, 2016 ��त/Copy to:- 1) अपीलाथ� /The Appellant. 2) ��यथ� /The Respondent. 3) The CIT(A) -10, Mumbai. 4) The Director of Income-tax (Int. Tax.) -1, Mumbai.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- DCIT 2(2)(1), Mumbai vs State Bank of India, MumbaiMumbai21 May 2018Dismissed
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the need for a liberal approach to advance substantial justice. The Tribunal also held that the assessee is entitled to interest under Section 244A from the fi...
- ADIT (It) 1(1), Mumbai vs Asia Today Ltd( New), MumbaiMumbai8 Mar 2016Dismissed
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to interest on TDS from the first day of the assessment year, even if TDS certificates were filed late, provided the tax was deducted and deposited on time. This decision f...
- DDIT (It) 1(1), Mumbai vs Asia Today Ltd, MumbaiMumbai23 Dec 2015Dismissed
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to interest under Section 244A from the first day of the assessment year, even if TDS certificates were filed late, provided the tax was deducted and deposited in time. Thi...
- State Bank of India, Mumbai vs Asst CIT Cir 2(2), MumbaiMumbai21 Apr 2026Partly Allowed
The Tribunal restored certain issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, particularly regarding the computation of interest on refunds and the allowability of provisions for wage revision. Other grounds were...
- Vardhman Textiles Ltd, Ludhiana vs Pr.CIT-1, LudhianaChandigarh30 Jul 2021Allowed
The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to interest on the refund for the entire period of delay as per Section 244A(1)(b) of the Act. It was decided that there was no delay attributable to the assessee in the p...
More judgments on Section 244A
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(3), RajkotITA 366/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(5), RajkotITA 257/RJT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Pratibha Sanjai Srivastava, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 2565/AHD/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2021-2022
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026