M/S NEW ERA ENGINEERS CO. OP. SOCIETY LTD.,PURULIA vs. DCIT, CIR-3, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 406/KOL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 March 2016AY 2008-20091 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s order to be cryptic, non-speaking, and lacking in proper opportunity for the assessee. Therefore, the order was quashed and the appeal was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal arose from an order by the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The assessment was initially framed by the DCIT under section 143(3).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) passed a speaking order and afforded sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri Mahavir Singh, JM]

Hearing: 11.03.2016Pronounced: 11.03.2016

This appeal by assessee is arising out of order of CIT(A), Asansol vide Appeal No. 323/CIT(A)/asl/cir-3/Asl/10-11 dated 11.12.2013. Assessment was framed by DCIT, circle-3, Asansol u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2008-09 vide his order dated 30.11.2010. 2. At the time of hearing, I have gone through the order of CIT(A) and seen that the order passed by him is cryptic, non-speaking and also sufficient opportunity of hearing was not given to the assessee. There is no iota of merits discussed in his order. The duty of the CIT(A) is to pass a speaking order after controverting all the facts given by assessee and decide the issue with reasons after affording proper opportunity of hearing. Since this was absent in his order, I quash the same and remit the appeal back to his file for fresh adjudication with the above direction. I order accordingly. The appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

3.

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court. (Mahavir Singh) Judicial Member Dated : 11th March, 2016 Jd. Sr. P.S Copy of the order forwarded to:

1.

Appellant – New Era Engineers Co.op. Society Ltd., P.O. Dulmi Nadiha, PS & Dist. Purulia-723102

2.

Respondent – DCIT, Cir-3, Asansol.

3.

CIT(A) , Asansol

4.

CIT , Asansol.

5.

DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata /, By order, Asstt.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →