ITO 10(3)-1, MUMBAI vs. AREEN CONSULTANTS P.LTD, NAVI MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the Assessing Officers. The appeals were held to be not maintainable due to the low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officers filed appeals for assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. The tax effect in both cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit are maintainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order u/s.254(1)of the Income-tax Act,1961(Act) खंडपीठ खंडपीठ केकेकेके अनुसार खंडपीठ खंडपीठ अनुसार अनुसार PER Bench- अनुसार The above appeals were filed by the Assessing Officers (AO.s) raising various grounds of appeal for the assessment years mentioned above.The tax effect involved in both the cases is below the monetary limit,(Rs.10,00,000/-) prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT),vide its Circular No.21/2015(F.No.279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt.) dated 10th December, 2015. 2.Authorised Representatives(AR)for the first appeal appeared, whereas none appeared for the second appeal,as stated earlier.The Departmental Representatives (DR.s),on a query by the Bench,fairly conceded that the tax involved in both the above cases was less than Rs.10.00 lacs. Considering these facts,we dismiss the appeals holding them as not maintainable. As a result, appeals filed by the Assessing Officers stand dismissed. फलतः िनधा�रती अिधका�रय� �ारा दािखल क� गई अपील� नामंजूर क� जाती ह�. Order pronounced in the open court on 7th March, 2016. आदेश क� घोषणा खुले �यायालय म� �दनांक 7 माच�, 2016 को क� गई । Sd/- Sd/- (अिमत शु�ल/ Amit Shukla ) (राजे�� / Rajendra) �याियक सद�य/Judicial Member लेखा सद�य/Accountant Member मुंबई Mumbai, �दनांक Date: 07.03.2016 Jv.Sr.PS. आदेश क� क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : आदेश आदेश आदेश क� क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत
5474/M/13,1281/M/14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026