Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “A”, MUMBAI
Before: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajendra
आदेश / O R D E R Per Joginder Singh (Judicial Member) The Revenue is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 05/12/2011 of the ld. First Appellate Authority, Mumbai, whereas, the assessee has also preferred cross objection against the aforesaid order.
First, we shall take up the appeal of the Revenue ( ) on the grounds stated therein. During hearing, the ld. DR, Shri Sunil K. Jha, sought permission to withdraw the appeal of the department to which the ld. counsel for the assessee, Ms. Hiral D. Sejpal, had no objection. In view of the request, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn.
So far as, the cross objection of the assessee is concerned, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated that, in view of the withdrawal of appeal by the department, it will
C.O. No.63/Mum/2013 Aruna M. Faria become in-fructuous. Thus, the cross objection of the assessee are also dismissed as in-fructuous.
Finally, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, whereas, the cross objection of the assessee is dismissed being in-fructuous.
This order was pronounced in the open in the presence of ld. representatives from both sides at the conclusion of the hearing on 04/04/2016.