JCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S DELL INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect. The tax amount was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer treated transportation charges claimed as exempt by the assessee as taxable fringe benefits. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, leading to an appeal by the Revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether transportation charges are taxable as fringe benefits and if the appeal is maintainable due to low tax effect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 115WB(2)(f),Section 115WE(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE
In this appeal, the Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A),LTU, Bangalore, dated 17/06/2013 in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 115WB(2)(f) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short].
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee-company which is engaged in the business of manufacture and trading of M/s.Dell India Pvt. Ltd. Page 2 of 3 computer systems filed its return of income for assessment year 2009-10 on 30/9/2009 declaring a total value of fringe benefits of Rs.8,16,22,914/-. During the assessment proceedings u/s 115WE(3) of the Act, the AO observed that the assessee has claimed transportation charges of Rs.50,19,592/- to be exempt from fringe benefit tax. The AO, however, held it to be in the nature of conveyance which is taxable u/s 115WB(2)(f) of the Act as fringe benefit. He, therefore, brought 20% of such expenses i.e. Rs.10,03,980/- to tax. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) who deleted the disallowance and the revenue is in appeal before us against the relief given by the CIT(A).
At the time of hearing, the learned Departmental Representative supported the order of the AO while the learned counsel for the assessee placed reliance upon the order of the CIT(A). In addition to the above, the learned counsel for the assessee has also brought to our notice that the tax effect in this case is only Rs.3,01,175/- which is less than the monetary limit of Rs.4 lakhs fixed by the CBDT for filing of appeals before the Tribunal and is therefore liable to be dismissed as not maintainable. He placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ranka & Ranka (2012)(206 ITR 322; Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Smt.Vijaya V.Kavekar (2013) 350 ITR 237 and Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sureshchandra
M/s.Dell India Pvt. Ltd. Page 3 of 3 Durgaprasad Khatod (HUF) (2014) 363 ITR 556 in support of the above contention.
Having regard to the rival contentions and the material on record, we find that the taxable value of the transportation charges with regard to fringe benefit is Rs.10,03,918/- and tax on the same at the rate of 30% is Rs.3,01,175/- which is less than the monetary limit of Rs.4 lakhs fixedby the CBDT. In view of the same, we dismiss the revenue’s appeal on account of low tax effect.
More judgments on Section 115WE(3)
- Gtn Textiles Limited, Ernakulam vs DCIT Corporate Cir 1(1) Kochi, ErnakulamITA 807/COCH/2025[2006-07]Status: Disposed21 Nov 2025AY 2006-07
- Mascot Industries, Kannur vs DCIT Circle 1(1), KannurITA 359/COCH/2023[2006-07]Status: Disposed27 Sept 2024AY 2006-07
- The DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Baroda vs Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd…ITA 3367/AHD/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed26 Sept 2024AY 2007-08
- M/S. Prakash Industries Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. CIT, HisarITA 349/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: Disposed5 Jan 2024AY 2006-07
- Bilfinger Neo Structo Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly… vs The ACIT, Circle-1, SuratITA 1101/AHD/2015[2006-07]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2022AY 2006-07
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026