ITO, RISHIKESH vs. M/S. DWARIKESH HOTEL, RISHIKESH
In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit for appeals. Following the CBDT circular, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. Both the Revenue and the Assessee agreed that the tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 10,00,000/-. This amount was below the monetary limit for filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal as per CBDT Circular No. F. No. 279/ Misc.142/207 ITJ(Pt) dated 10th December, 2015.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on the tax effect being below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM
This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order dated 29/8/2013 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-I, Dehradun.
The Ld. DR as well as the Ld. AR submitted that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than 10,00,000/-.
3. CBDT Circular No. F. No. 279/ Misc.142/207 ITJ(Pt) dated 10th December, 2015, in Para 3 and 10 describes as under:
Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:
S No. Appeals in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/-
…….
This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.”
Thus, this is a pending appeal and is covered by the CBDT Circular No. F. No. 279/ Misc.142/207 ITJ(Pt) dated 10th December, 2015. The Ld. DR requested for withdrawal of the appeal. We allow, the Revenue’s request for withdrawal of appeal.
In result, the appeal is disposed off as withdrawn by the Revenue.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 15th of December 2015.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026