THE GANDHIDHAM MERCANTILE CO-OP. BANK LTD. ,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that no additions were made by the Assessing Officer while giving effect to the revision order. Consequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. During the process of giving effect to the revision order, the Assessing Officer made no additions to the assessee's income.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee is maintainable when no additions were made by the Assessing Officer pursuant to the revision order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar
The Gandhidham The Pr. CIT, Mercantile Co-op. Bank Rajkot-1, Rakot Ltd. Vs Plot No. 12, (Respondent) GMCB Bhawan, Ravindranath Tagore Road, Section-8, Gandhidham-370201 PAN No: AAAJT0274H (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Smt.Aastha Maniar, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 12-09-2023 Date of pronouncement : 13-09-2023 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the Revision order dated 09.02.2022 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot-1, under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2017-18.
Page No 2 The Gandhidham Mercantile Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. PCIT
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel Smt. Aastha Maniar appearing for the assessee submitted that while giving effect to the Revision order by the Assessing Officer, no additions were made by the A.O. Therefore the assessee sought permission to withdraw the above appeal filed by the assessee.
The Ld. CIT-DR Shri Shramdeep Sinha appearing for the Revenue has no serious objection in withdrawing the above appeal by the assessee.
Recording the above submissions of the parties, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026