AKBAR KHAN,COOCHBIHAR vs. C.I.T KOLKATA - XXI, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's non-appearance and the defective nature of the appeal, which should have been two separate appeals. Consequently, the appeal was treated as unadmitted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT's order rejecting applications for registration under section 12A and exemption under section 80G. The assessee failed to appear for the hearing and had filed a defective appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is maintainable due to non-appearance and defective filing. Whether the applications for registration and exemption were rightly rejected.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
Date of concluding the hearing : May 09, 2016 Date of pronouncing the order : May 09, 2016
O R D E R Per Shri P.M. Jagtap :- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-XXI, Kolkata dated 30.08.2012. whereby he rejected the application filed by the assessee for registration under section 12A as well as the application filed by the assessee for grant of exemption under section 80G.
In this case, the appeal of the assessee was initially fixed for hearing on 05.04.2016. The assessee, however, filed an application seeking adjournment and accordingly the hearing was adjourned to 09.05.2016. On 09.05.2016, none, however, has appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any application seeking adjournment has been filed despite
I.T.A. No. 2052/KOL./2013 Page 2 of 2 the fact that the said date of hearing pronounced in the open Court on the earlier date, i.e. 05.04.2016 was duly taken note of by the representative of the assessee. It is also observed that the assessee has filed only one appeal against the common order dated 30.08.2012 passed by the ld. CIT while disposing of his application for registration under section 12A as well as for exemption under section 80G while the assessee is required to file two separate appeals against the said order. This appeal filed by the assessee thus is defective and keeping in view the same as well as the non-cooperative and non-complaint attitude of the assessee, we treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss the same.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026