DCIT, CHENNAI vs. COSMO FOUNDATIONS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1469/CHNY/2014Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 December 2015AY 2006-077 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that Smt. Vimalamma's statements were inconsistent and that the assessee had not sufficiently proved the genuineness, creditworthiness, and identity of the transaction. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further inquiry.

What were the facts?

The assessee purchased land from Smt. Vimalamma and treated the unpaid balance as share application money. Smt. Vimalamma later denied this, stating she had not received the full amount and had not agreed to it being treated as share application money.

What were the issues?

Whether the unpaid balance of land sale consideration, treated as share application money by the assessee, was a genuine transaction and adequately explained, given the conflicting statements of the seller.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 133A,Section 148,Section 131

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR

For Appellant: Shri. Y. Sridhar, C.A
For Respondent: Shri. A.V.Sreekanth, IRS, JCIT
Hearing: 07.12.2015Pronounced: 31.12.2015

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A.No.1469/Mds/2014
I.T.A.No.1995/Mds/2014

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

These are cross appeals directed against the order of Commi

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 133A

All 5,893 judgments and leading authorities on Section 133A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →