ITO, KANCHEEPURAM vs. SHRI D. KARUPPAIAH, THIRUVALLUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in the assessee's appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as not maintainable due to a low tax effect, following a CBDT circular.
What were the facts?
The assessee withdrew their appeal, and the Revenue's appeal was considered. The Revenue's appeal involved a tax effect of less than ₹10 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable when the tax effect is below the threshold specified by CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Both the assessee and the Revenue have filed appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Chennai, dated 19.09.2013 and pertain to assessment year 2009-
We heard both the appeals together and disposing of the same by this common order.
There was a delay of 18 days in filing this appeal by the assessee. The assessee has filed a petition for condonation of delay. We have heard the Ld. representative and the Ld. D.R. We find that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal before the stipulated time. Therefore, we condone the delay and admit the appeal.
When the appeal of the assessee was taken up for hearing, the Ld. representative for the assessee submitted that he is not pressing the appeal and hence, the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
3 I.T.A. No.2253/Mds/13 4. Now coming to Revenue’s appeal, the only issue arises for consideration is with regard to relief given by the CIT(Appeals) to the extent of `15,07,000/-. The tax effect on this amount of `15,07,000/- is less than `10 lakhs. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that in view of the latest Circular issued by the CBDT in Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the Department was instructed to withdraw all the appeals pending before the Tribunal wherever the tax effect is less than `10 lakhs. In view of the above circular of CBDT, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the Revenue’s appeal is not maintainable. Hence, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue are dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026