BABU SINGH,GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessment order under which the satisfaction for penalty initiation was recorded has been set aside, the consequent penalty order is also liable to be cancelled. The Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalty.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment order was set aside by the CIT(A) for fresh assessment. A penalty was levied under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with statutory notices during the original assessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(b) can sustain when the assessment order, which formed the basis for penalty initiation, has been set aside.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 271(1)(b),Section 142(1),Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A), in short] dated 10.03.2025 in Appeal No. NFAC/2014-15/10297028 arising out of order passed u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) dated 20.09.2023 for Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessment of the assessee was completed vide order dated 21.03.2023 passed u/s 147/144 r.w.s 144B of the Act wherein the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) were initiated for non-compliance of the statutory notices. Thereafter, the AO proceeded with pending penalty proceedi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1195/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1194/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1193/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Laxmi Narain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-20, New DelhiITA 4432/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Laxminarain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circel-20, New DelhiITA 4431/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026