SHRI HITESH DAYALJI VED,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT CIRCLE - 2 (2) (2), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 169/RJT/2023Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot16 October 2023Bench: SHRI WASEEM AHMED (Accountant Member), SHRI T.R SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal set aside the ex-parte order and restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, granting the assessee an opportunity to present their contentions.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was confirmed ex-parte by the CIT(A) due to non-appearance. Notices were sent to the accountant's email, not the assessee's, and the accountant failed to inform the assessee.

What were the issues?

Whether an ex-parte assessment order passed due to incorrect service of notice is sustainable. Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity to present their case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Conducted through E-Court, Rajkot

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI T.R SENTHIL KUMAR

For Appellant: Shri Gaurang Khakhar, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT. D.R
Hearing: 20/07/2023Pronounced: 16/10/2023

आदेश/O R D E R

PER WASEEM AHMED ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Rajkot, (in short “Ld.CIT(A)”) arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13.

Asstt. Year 2012-13 2

2.

At the outset, we note that the Ld.CIT(A), has confirmed the order of the AO ex-parte to the assessee on the reasoning that the assessee failed to appear despite the notices issued to him. However, on perusal of records, we note that the notices were issued to the email id (manishparmar67@gmail.com), belonging to the accountant though the email id (hiteshved123@gmail.com) of the assessee was furnished in form 35, appeal to the ld. CIT-A. As per the assessee, the accountant never informed to him (the assessee) about the notices. Accordingly, it was prayed to restore the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. Considering the above facts and ex-parte order of the AO, we are, in the interest of justice and fair play, inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee to raise his contentions before the AO. Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee is set- aside to the file of the AO, for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Court on 16/10/2023 at Ahmedabad.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →