SHRI HITESH DAYALJI VED,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT CIRCLE - 2 (2) (2), RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal set aside the ex-parte order and restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, granting the assessee an opportunity to present their contentions.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was confirmed ex-parte by the CIT(A) due to non-appearance. Notices were sent to the accountant's email, not the assessee's, and the accountant failed to inform the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte assessment order passed due to incorrect service of notice is sustainable. Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Conducted through E-Court, Rajkot
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI T.R SENTHIL KUMAR
आदेश/O R D E R
PER WASEEM AHMED ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Rajkot, (in short “Ld.CIT(A)”) arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13.
Asstt. Year 2012-13 2
At the outset, we note that the Ld.CIT(A), has confirmed the order of the AO ex-parte to the assessee on the reasoning that the assessee failed to appear despite the notices issued to him. However, on perusal of records, we note that the notices were issued to the email id (manishparmar67@gmail.com), belonging to the accountant though the email id (hiteshved123@gmail.com) of the assessee was furnished in form 35, appeal to the ld. CIT-A. As per the assessee, the accountant never informed to him (the assessee) about the notices. Accordingly, it was prayed to restore the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. Considering the above facts and ex-parte order of the AO, we are, in the interest of justice and fair play, inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee to raise his contentions before the AO. Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee is set- aside to the file of the AO, for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Court on 16/10/2023 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026