SHRI RAVENDRA PRATAP SINGH,BHOPAL vs. THE CIT NRFAC, DELHI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against order dated 20.03.2023 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for A.Y.2018-19.
None has appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the notices issued through registered RPAD as well as e-mail on the e-mail ID given in from 36. Further it transpired from the record that there is a delay of 25 days in filing the present appeal. The application for condonation of delay and form No.36 has not been signed by the assessee. The memo of appeal is neither signed nor verified by the assessee therefore, this appeal is not a valid appeal. The assessee is also not responding to the notices issued. 3. Accordingly in the facts and circumstance of the case when the memo of Page 1 of 2
ITA No.235/Ind/2023 Ravendra Pratap Singh Page 2 of 2 appeal is neither signed nor verified by the assesse then the present appeal of the assesse is not a valid appeal and liable to be dismissed in limine. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed being invalid appeal.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is dismissed.
Order is pronounced in Open Court on conclusion of hearing on 25/ 09/2023
Sd/- sd/- (B.M. BIYANI) (VIJAY PAL RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member
Indore, 25.09.2023 Patel/Sr. PS
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Sr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 2 of 2