S.S.CHEMTRADE,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the NFAC's order and remanded the matter back. The NFAC is directed to consider the delay condonation petition and decide the appeal on its merits after hearing the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the NFAC was dismissed due to a 65-day delay without proper explanation. The delay occurred because the partner handling the firm's affairs passed away and was critically ill.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the NFAC should be condoned due to the unfortunate demise and illness of the partner handling the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “ B ” BENCH
Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R Senthil Kumar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “ B ” BENCH Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member And Shri T.R Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member ITA No:223/Ahd/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-19 S S Chemtrade, The D.C.I.T, A-508, Infinity, Circle-2(1)(1), Opp Safal Profitare Vs Ahmedabad. Satellite, Ahmedabad-380015. PAN:ACGFS8540K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Shri Dipak Thakkar, AR Shri Sudhendu Das, Sr-DR Revenue Represented: Date of hearing : 04-07-2024 Date of pronouncement : 15-07-2024 आदेश/ORDER
PER T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal is filed by the assessee as against the ex-party appellate order dated 24.03.2023 passed by the the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi arising out of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"] relating to the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.
The Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that there is a delay of 65 days in filing the appeal before the Ld.CIT(A). However, the delay was not explained properly by filing affidavit. For this reason, the appeal was dismissed without going into merit of the case. Now, the assessee through its Partner filed a Notarized affidavit S S Chemtrade vs. DCIT Page No.2 Asst.Year 2018-19 explaining that the earlier Partner who was looking after the affairs of the partnership firm was passed away on 08.04.2024 and was bed ridden from July 2021 and often hospitalized for critical illness. Therefore, requested to condone the delay of 65 days in filing the appeal before the NFAC. The Ld.DR appearing for the Revenue has no objection in setting aside the mater back to the file of NFAC.
On perusal of the affidavit and medical records of the deceased partner, this appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be set-aside to the file of the NFAC with a direction to consider the condonation delay petition and pass order on merits after giving opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Needless to say, that assessee should make use of this opportunity by filing the relevant paper/documents before the NFAC, for passing order on merits of the case. Hence, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 15/07/2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026