RAMNIKLAL GORDHANDAS KOTECHA,RAJKOT vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the section 263 proceedings were quashed by a co-ordinate bench. Consequently, the assessment order had no basis, and the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 read with section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later submitted that a co-ordinate bench had quashed the section 263 proceedings.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the assessment order in light of the quashing of the section 263 proceedings by a higher tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: WASEEM AHMED & SHRI T.R.SENTHIL KUMAR
आदेश / O R D E R
PER T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 19/09/2014 passed by the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-III, Rajkot [hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)], arising out of order passed u/s.263 r.w.s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") relating to the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11.
Ramniklal G. Kotecha vs. ITO Asst.Year - 2010-11 - 2 -
At the outset, the assessee filed a letter stating that the 263 proceedings was quashed by this Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal vide order dated 01/06/2022 in ITA No.49/Rjt/2014. Thus, the present assessment order has no legs to stand and, therefore, sought permission to withdraw the above appeal filed by the assessee.
Though the Registry has noted substantial delay in filing the above appeal, without going into the same, the present appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026