DCIT, TIRUPPUR vs. SAKTHI MURUGAN ROLLER FLOUR MILLS LIMITED, AVANASHI

ITA 1985/CHNY/2015Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 January 2016AY 2011-124 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the pendency of an SLP before the Supreme Court does not prevent it from following the binding judgment of the jurisdictional High Court. Therefore, the CIT(Appeals) order was rightly passed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(Appeals) order allowing deduction under Section 80-IA. The CIT(Appeals) followed a Madras High Court judgment, and the Revenue's only objection was the pendency of a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court.

What were the issues?

Whether the pendency of an SLP before the Supreme Court is a valid reason to disregard a jurisdictional High Court's judgment for the purpose of allowing deductions under Section 80-IA.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80-IA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY

Hearing: 28.12.2015Pronounced: 01.01.2016

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.1985/Mds/2015
ITA No.1988/Mds/2015

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JU

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80-IA

All 612 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80-IA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →