DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(2), NEW DELHI vs. ADVENTURE RESORTS AND CRUISES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the AO had not rejected the assessee's books of accounts. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence of purchases and sales, including bills, vouchers, and ledger accounts, and that the payments were made through account payee cheques.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed purchases of Rs. 3,82,66,575/- on the grounds that the suppliers were not found at the given addresses and the purchases were bogus. The assessee claimed these purchases were for textile commodities. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, holding that the assessee had produced books of accounts, stock registers, and evidence of payments and receipts through account payee cheques.
What were the issues?
Whether purchases from parties not found at their given addresses can be treated as bogus when the assessee has maintained proper books of accounts and provided evidence of transactions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 133(6),Section 271(1)(c),Section 145,Section 143(2),Section 127
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”, NEW DELHI
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT :
This appeal by the Revenue and Cross Objection by the Assessee are arising of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-I), New Delhi in Appeal No. 442/16-17 dated 12.07.2017. Assessment was framed by the DCIT, Circle 1(2), New Delhi for the assessment year 2014- 15 u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the “Act”) vide his order dated 13.2.2016. 2. First we deal with Revenue
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133(6)
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rangoli Hotel, Mehsana vs DCIT, Circle, Gandhinagar, GandhiangarITA 2286/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Ritu Rajesh Gohil, Jamnagar, Gujarat vs ITO Ward 2(1), Jamnagar, GujaratITA 109/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026