BALUBHAI BARANBHAI BABARIYA,SURAT vs. PR. CIT, SURAT 1, SURAT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not wish to press the appeal and the Departmental Representative raised no objection. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal challenging an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's counsel submitted that the assessee did not wish to press the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be pressed by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM
सुनवाईक�तार�ख/ Date of Hearing : 10/04/2023 घोषणाक�तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement : 10/04/2023 आदेश / O R D E R
PER Dr. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal is preferred by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 29.03.2022, passed by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1 [in short “the PCIT”], under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”].
Before us, the Learned Counsel, Shri Ashwin K. Parekh, on behalf of the assessee, submitted that assessee did not wish to press this appeal, to which, the learned Departmental Representative (in short the “the ld. DR”) did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
Balubhai Naranbhai Babariya 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in for AY.2017-18) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced on 10/04/2023 in the open court.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026