No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
(Assessment Year: 2018-19) Safikahmed Mehamudali Ansari, Income Tax Officer, Vs. L-190, Jitu Bhagat Compound, Ward 6(1)(1), Opp. Shahalam, Dalilimda, Vejalpur, Gujarat-380028 Ahmedabad PAN : AAZPA 8241 L (Appellant) (Respondent) .. Appellant by : Shri Chirag R. Shah, AR Respondent by: Shri C. Dharani Nath, Sr DR Date of Hearing 19.11.2024 Date of Pronouncement 22.11.2024 O R D E R PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT :
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)" for short), dated 30.07.2024 passed under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short], for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.
The Assessee has taken following grounds of appeal:- “1 The assessment order passed u/s 154 of Income Tax Act by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the first appellate authority u/s 250 is bad in law and deserved to be uncalled for.
2 The assessing officer as well as first appellate authority has erred in law and on facts in making the addition of Rs. 20,63,673/- by disallowing the depreciation claim. The same deserves to be deleted.”
At the time of hearing before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the claim of depreciation for which the assessee is eligible has been allowed in the preceding year as well as in the succeeding year. It was submitted that the depreciation was not allowed owing to mistake in the claim of depreciation. Hence, the matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer to examine the claim of depreciation considering the fact of allowing the same in the earlier and succeeding years, and to pass an order under Section 154 in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
The order is pronounced in the open Court on 22.11.2024