SUDHA BAKSHI,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 30(3), DELHI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18, arises against the Addl./JCIT(A)-3, Chennai’s DIN & order No.
ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1077021666(1) dated 13.06.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short
“the Act”).
Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee/appellant is aggrieved against both the learned lower authorities’ action treating her cash deposits during demonetization of Rs.10,00,000/- as unexplained, in assessment order dated 09.12.2019 which has been restricted to Rs.8,00,000/- in the lower appellate discussion. Sudha Bakshi
2
4. That being the case, learned counsel invites the tribunal’s attention to page 37 in the assessee’s paper book indicating her mother Smt. Pushpa Rani who have expired on 29.04.2016. It is made clear that there is no dispute that both the assessee and her mother are stated to be above the age of 70 years in the relevant previous year. Learned counsel in this backdrop further quotes the CBDT’s landmark circular No. 3/2017
wherein para
1.1
of “sole specific general verification guidelines” made it clear that in case of taxpayers over and above 70 years of age, the limit of exemption from verification was Rs.5,00,000/- per person. This clinching fact has gone un- rebutted from the Revenue side. Be that as it may, it is further not the assessee’s case that she had successfully explained the cash in hand of her mother all along before learned lower authorities. It is thus deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice that a lump sum addition of Rs.1,00,000/- only in the given facts would be just and proper with a rider that the same shall not be treated as a precedent. The assessee gets relief of Rs.7,00,000/- in other words.
So far as assessee’s assessment under Section 115BBE is concerned, I quote S.M.I.L.E Microfinance Limited Vs. The ACIT CC-1 in W.P.(MD) No.2078 of 2020 & W.M.P. (MD) No. 1742 of 2020 held that the said provision applied for transactions done Sudha Bakshi
3
on or after 01.04.2017 only. The assessee is accordingly directed to be assessed under normal provisions only.
This assessee’s appeal is partly allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 07/10/2025. (Satbeer Singh Godara)
Judicial Member
Dated: 07/10/2025
*Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*