SHRI JITENDRAKUMAR PRABHUDAS PATEL,MEHSANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, PATAN

ITA 11/AHD/2015Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 September 2017AY 2006-075 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was not properly heard and that additional evidence was not considered. In the interest of justice, the matter was remitted back to the AO for a fresh decision.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment based on AIR information about cash deposits of Rs. 10,06,000/-. The assessee failed to respond to notices, leading to an ex-parte assessment under Section 144. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment was reopened and finalized without proper inquiry and opportunity to the assessee, and whether the CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating all grounds of appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ SMC ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD loZJh egkohj izlkn] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa vejthr flag] ys[kk lnL; ds le{kA loZJh egkohj izlkn] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa vejthr flag]

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH

For Respondent: Shri Prajnu Paramita, Sr.D.R
Pronounced: 27/09/2017

PER SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER :

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →