CATHERINE JEAN CHANDHOK,DELHI vs. PCIT, NOIDA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an order passed under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act is not appealable before the ITAT, as per Section 253(1) of the Act. Therefore, the appeal was rejected at the initial stage.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order of the PCIT, Noida, passed under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. No one appeared on behalf of the assessee, and the appeal proceeded with the assistance of the Departmental Representative.
What were the issues?
Whether an order passed under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act is appealable before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘G’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld.
PCIT, Noida dated 31.01.2025 pertaining to A.Y 2020-21.
None appeared for and on behalf of the assessee. We decided to proceed with the assistance of the ld. DR. Therefore, the ld. DR was heard at length and the Case records were carefully perused.
At the very outset, we find that the challenge before us is against the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] dated 31.01.2025 passed by the PCIT, Noida. We find that the order u/s section 253(1) of the Act.
Section 119 of the IT Act empowers the Central Board of Taxes (CBDT) to issue instructions to lower levels of authority for proper administration of the Income tax Act. For this purpose, section 119(2)(b) empowers CBDT to authorize any income tax authorities to admit any claim for exemption, deduction, refund and any other relief under the income tax act even after the expiry of the time limit to make such claim to avoid genuine hardship to the assessee. However, such claims will only be entertained by the income tax authority provided such claims are made within the prescribed due date and the default occurred due to circumstances beyond the taxpayer’s control. Since the instant order u/s 119(2)(b) is not appealable, we reject the appeal at the initial stage itself. We, therefore, dismiss the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee. dismissed.
Order pronounced in open court on 08.10.2025.
More judgments on Section 119(2)(b)
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Pushpa Chandra Raj Singhvi Charitable… vs CIT(Exemption), Income Tax Appellate TribunaITA 8820/MUM/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Pratik Deepak Agarwal, Lonavla vs Assessing Officer, Ward 9(3), Akurdi, PuneITA 2227/PUN/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2025-2026
- Pushpa Bitan Friendship Society, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 1(4), Exemption, KolkataITA 2607/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Tiong Woon Project & Contracting Pte Ltd… vs ACIT, Intl. Taxn. Circle-2(2), ChennaiITA 1883/CHNY/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026