A J CHARITABLE TRUST,VANCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), VEJALPUR AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. This was based on the assessee's submission that insufficient response time and missed email notices led to non-compliance.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application due to the assessee's failure to respond to notices and submit required details.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of a registration application under Section 12AB for non-compliance due to missed notices is justified, or if a fresh opportunity should be granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT :
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as "CIT(E)" for short) dated 15.05.2024, rejecting the application for registration of the Trust u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed an application seeking registration of the Trust under Section 12AB of the Act in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the I.T. Rules, 1962 on 11.11.2023. The ld. CIT (E), vide impugned order, rejected the assessee’s application for registration u/s 12AB owing to non-response and non-submission of required details by the assessee.
AJ Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 2–
Aggrieved with the order of the Ld. CIT(E) rejecting the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AB of the Act, the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal.
Before us, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee was unable to respond to the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(E) within the prescribed timeframe due to the insufficient response time provided. He further stated that the assessee did not frequently access its email account, which led to missing the notices sent by the Department via email. The Ld. AR pleaded that, given an opportunity, due compliance would be made before the Ld. CIT(E). Hence, keeping in view the entire facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) to pass the order afresh, after due issue of notice of hearing to the assessee on a valid email ID.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
The order is pronounced in the open Court on 19.12.2024
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Noore Manpower Services vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Maa Bhawani Minrals vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026