SHREE DURGA SYNTEX PRIVATE LTD.,,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX - 1, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The revenue's representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18. The assessee's authorized representative requested to withdraw the appeal unconditionally.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeal unconditionally. The primary issue was the assessee's request for withdrawal, not the merits of the original Section 263 order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee represented by Shri Mehul Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Ashok B. Koli- CIT-DR Date of Institution of Appeal 04/03/2023 Date of hearing 23/05/2023 Date of pronouncement 23/05/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
1. 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Surat (in short, the ld. Pr.CIT) dated 31/03/2022 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) for the Assessment year (AY) 2017-18.
2. The appeal came up for hearing on today i.e. 23/05/2023, the learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee submits that as per instruction of assessee, he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal unconditionally. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax- Departmental Representative (ld.CIT-DR) for the revenue has no objection if the ld. AR of assessee is allowed to withdraw the appeal.
Shree Durga Syntex Private Limited Vs Pr.CIT Therefore, considering the submissions of both the parties, the ld. AR of the assessee is allowed to withdraw the present appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn 3. In the result, this appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd May, 2023 at the time of hearing.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026