SAIRAM NAGRIL SAHKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,AURANGABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4),,AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

PDF
ITA 1363/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 January 2024AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI R.S. SYAL (Vice President)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL

For Appellant: Shri Vilesh Dalya
For Respondent: Shri R.Y. Balawade

आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP:

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the ex parte order dated

16-10-2023 passed by the ld. CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal

Centre (NFAC), Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter

also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2017-18.

2.

I have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material

on record. It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed

u/s.143(3) of the Act determining total income at Rs.22.94 lakh against

Nil income declared by the assessee. The ld. CIT(A) also dismissed the

appeal by means of an ex parte order in the absence of the assessee.

The ld. AR urged for restoration of the matter to the file of the

2 ITA No. 1363/PUN/2023 Sairam Nagril Sahkari Pat Sanstha Maryadit

Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment because the assessee was

incapacitated to participate in the proceedings before the learned

authorities for the reasons beyond its control. In view of the facts

obtaining in the instant case where both the assessment as well as the

first appellate orders have been passed in the absence of the assessee,

and considering the request made on behalf of the assessee, I am of the

opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-aside

and the matter is remitted to the file of the AO with a direction to pass

the assessment order afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable

opportunity of hearing to the assessee. I order accordingly. Needless to

say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence in support

of his case in the fresh assessment.

3.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 01st January, 2024.

Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) VICE PRESIDENT

पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 01st January, 2024. Satish

3 ITA No. 1363/PUN/2023 Sairam Nagril Sahkari Pat Sanstha Maryadit

आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent; 3. The Pr.CIT concerned िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, 4. SMC, Pune / DR, ITAT, Pune गाड� फाईल / Guard file 5.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

Date 1. Draft dictated on 29-12-2023 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 01-01-2024 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the JM second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second JM Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *

SAIRAM NAGRIL SAHKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,AURANGABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4),,AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD | BharatTax