TANAJI ANNASAHEB PATIL,NASHIK vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, , NASHIK

PDF
ITA 951/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 January 2024AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI R.S. SYAL (Vice President), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘B’ PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Sanket Joshi
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani

आदेश / ORDER

PER R.S. SYAL, VP :

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 28-07-2023 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless

Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in relation to the assessment year

2014-15.

2.

We have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant

material on record. It is seen that the assessment order in this case

was passed 143(3) of the Act determining total income at Rs.1.46

crore as against the returned income at Rs.27.70 lakh. The ld.

CIT(A) dismissed the appeal by means of an ex parte order in the

2 ITA No.951/PUN/2023 Tanaji Annasaheb Patil

absence of the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that the assessee’s

case could not be represented before the ld. first appellate authority

because the notices were issued at the e-mail id of the earlier

counsel who was associated with the assessee at the assessment

stage, is no more. He thus prayed for granting another opportunity.

In view of the facts obtaining in the instant case, we are of the

opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-

aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a

direction to decide the appeal afresh as per law after allowing a

reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. We order

accordingly. The ld. AR has undertaken that the assessee will

render full assistance to the ld. first appellate authority in such

fresh proceedings. Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to

lead any fresh evidence in support of his case in the fresh

proceedings .

3.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 02nd January, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 02nd January, 2024. सतीश

3 ITA No.951/PUN/2023 Tanaji Annasaheb Patil

आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 1. ��थ� / The respondent 2. 3. The CIT concerned 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 5.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

Date 1. Draft dictated on 02-01-2024 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 02-01-2024 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order.

TANAJI ANNASAHEB PATIL,NASHIK vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, , NASHIK | BharatTax