MRS RAJASHREE BABURAO BORKAR,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLR-8, PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order of the CIT(A) and remitted the matter back for a fresh decision. The assessee was granted an opportunity to present her case and lead fresh evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte due to the assessee's inability to participate for reasons beyond her control. The assessment order was passed under section 144 read with sections 263 and 144B.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee is sustainable. The need for a fair hearing in appellate proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘B’ PUNE
Before: JUSTICE C.V. BHADANG & SHRI R.S. SYAL
आदेश / ORDER
PER JUSTICE C.V. BHADANG, PRESIDENT :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 20-09-2023 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in relation to the assessment year 2016-17.
We have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed u/s.144 r.w.s.263 r.w.s.144B of the Act determining total income at Rs.2.01 crore. The ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal by means of an ex parte order in the 2 ITA.1276/PUN/2023 Rajashree Baburao Borkar absence of the assessee. The ld. AR urged for restoration of the matter to the file of the ld.CIT(A) because the assessee was incapacitated to participate in the proceedings before the learned first appellate authority for the reasons beyond her control. In view of the facts obtaining in the instant case, where the first appellate order has been passed in the absence of the assessee, we are of the opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. We order accordingly. Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence in support of her case in the fresh proceedings.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 03rd January, 2024.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026