SURESH CHANDEKAR SMRUTI PRATISHTAPAN,PUNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Income Tax laws are welfare legislations and not penal. Considering the spirit of the provisions for trust registration and exemption, the Tribunal decided to provide one final opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application after the assessee failed to provide satisfactory clarifications regarding discrepancies pointed out in response to notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AA was justified without providing a final opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM :
This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune (for short, „CIT(E)‟) dated 22.09.2023 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The only grievance of the assessee in this appeal is the rejection of application for registration u/sec. 12AA of the Act by the Department.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials/documents on record. We observe from the order of the ld. CIT(E) that the assessee had filed application for grant of registration u/sec. 12AA of the Act before the Department as per the requisite form and as per the various prescribed procedures for such application. The said application was perused by the ld. CIT(E), and in order to verify the genuineness of the activities and whether the assessee is complying with the relevant laws for the time being in force while doing activities as per its objects, certain details were called for from the assessee. The assessee was to submit compliance by 15/06/2023. Thereafter, the assessee submitted the details in response to the said notice, and on perusal of those details/documents various discrepancies were noticed by the Department. That, another notice was issued to the assessee asking for clarification regarding these discrepancies and to submit compliance by 30/06/2023, however, to this notice, the assessee neither submitted any explanation nor availed the opportunity of being heard, and it was presumed, accordingly, by the ld. CIT(E) that the assessee has nothing to say regarding the discrepancies pointed out and resultantly, the application for grant of registration under 12AA filed by the assessee was rejected.
We are of the considered view that it is a case where the application for registration of a trust was filed by the assessee, and for want of supporting evidences, the matter was rejected by the Department. It has to be appreciated that the purpose of the provisions for registration of trust u/sec. 12AA and granting of exemption u/sec. 80G, all these sections derives their spirit from the Directive Principles of State Policy enshrined in the Constitution of India. Since, the Govt. of India makes endeavor to provide welfare to one and all in the society at large and in view thereof the registration for public charitable trusts are given in order to ensure that through these charitable trusts benefits should flow to the entire society wherefrom various charitable activities, the entire society is benefited and the objectives of the Govt. of India in furtherance to the Directive Principles of State Policy are achieved. These provisions for the trust registration and granting of exemption u/sec. 80G enhance the socio economic welfare in the society. Furthermore, the Income Tax laws are welfare legislations and not penal in nature. Therefore, in the interest of justice and considering all the afore-stated observations, we are of the considered view that one final opportunity should be provided to the assessee to file the relevant details before the ld.CIT(E) and present their case on merits. In view thereof, we set aside the order of the ld. CIT(E) and remit the matter back to his file with the aforesaid direction and the ld. CIT(E) shall adjudicate denovo as per law complying with the principles of natural justice. Grounds of appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 25th day of January, 2024.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026