SANKET BATRA,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had earned long-term capital gains on the sale of securities, as the holding period for all sold securities exceeded 12 months. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer and Dispute Resolution Panel was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a non-resident employed in the USA, invested in Indian securities. During the assessment year 2016-17, the assessee sold certain securities and earned capital gains.
What were the issues?
Whether the capital gains on sale of securities were correctly treated as short-term capital gains by the revenue authorities, or if they were long-term capital gains as claimed by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment order dated 31.12.2024 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2016-17.
Shri Sachin Dhall, Advocate appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the short issue in appeal is treating of long term capital gains as short term capital gain by the Assessing Officer (AO). Narrating facts of the case the ld counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is a non-resident and is employed in the USA. The assessee has made investments in securities in India. During the period relevant to assessment year in appeal, the assessee has sold some of the securities on which the assessee has earned long term capital gains. To substantiate his submissions the assessee referred to DEMAT account Saket Batra statement and also the transaction details. The ld counsel submits that a perusal of the transaction details clearly show that all the securities that were sold during the relevant period were held for more than 12 months. The AO and the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) have erred in coming to the conclusion that the gain on securities is short term.
Per contra Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR appearing on behalf of the assessee vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for dismissing appeal of the assessee.
We have heard both the sides. The solitary issue in the present appeal is addition made in hands of the assessee on account of capital gains amounting to Rs. 76,082/-. During the relevant assessment year, the assessee has sold shares on which the assessee has earned long term capital gain of Rs. 76,082/-. The list of shares sold during FY 2015-16 and Long Term Profit/ Loss on sale of said shares is at pages 48 & 49 of the Paper Book. A perusal of the transactions of sale of shares clearly show that the assessee was holding said shares for more than 12 months. Thus, the AO and the DRP have erred in coming to the conclusion that the assessee has earned short term capital gain on sale of securities, whereas the documents on record clearly indicate the nature of capital gain as long term. In light of the documents on record, the addition is directed to be deleted.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026