SANKET BATRA,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1016/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 October 2025AY 2016-20173 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee had earned long-term capital gains on the sale of securities, as the holding period for all sold securities exceeded 12 months. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer and Dispute Resolution Panel was incorrect.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a non-resident employed in the USA, invested in Indian securities. During the assessment year 2016-17, the assessee sold certain securities and earned capital gains.

What were the issues?

Whether the capital gains on sale of securities were correctly treated as short-term capital gains by the revenue authorities, or if they were long-term capital gains as claimed by the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144C(13)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Sachin Dhall, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Hearing: 09/10/2025Pronounced: 09/10/2025
1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment order dated 31.12.2024 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2016-17.

2.

Shri Sachin Dhall, Advocate appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the short issue in appeal is treating of long term capital gains as short term capital gain by the Assessing Officer (AO). Narrating facts of the case the ld counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is a non-resident and is employed in the USA. The assessee has made investments in securities in India. During the period relevant to assessment year in appeal, the assessee has sold some of the securities on which the assessee has earned long term capital gains. To substantiate his submissions the assessee referred to DEMAT account Saket Batra statement and also the transaction details. The ld counsel submits that a perusal of the transaction details clearly show that all the securities that were sold during the relevant period were held for more than 12 months. The AO and the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) have erred in coming to the conclusion that the gain on securities is short term.

3.

Per contra Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR appearing on behalf of the assessee vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for dismissing appeal of the assessee.

4.

We have heard both the sides. The solitary issue in the present appeal is addition made in hands of the assessee on account of capital gains amounting to Rs. 76,082/-. During the relevant assessment year, the assessee has sold shares on which the assessee has earned long term capital gain of Rs. 76,082/-. The list of shares sold during FY 2015-16 and Long Term Profit/ Loss on sale of said shares is at pages 48 & 49 of the Paper Book. A perusal of the transactions of sale of shares clearly show that the assessee was holding said shares for more than 12 months. Thus, the AO and the DRP have erred in coming to the conclusion that the assessee has earned short term capital gain on sale of securities, whereas the documents on record clearly indicate the nature of capital gain as long term. In light of the documents on record, the addition is directed to be deleted.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →