PARAMARTH PRABODHAN SANSKRUTIK SEVA MANDAL,OMERGA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 943/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 February 2024Bench: SHRI S.S.GODARA (Judicial Member), DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE (Accountant Member)4 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It held that the CIT(E) failed to verify the charitable nature of the objects and activities despite the trust deed and financials being on record.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under section 12AA was rejected by the CIT(E) for failing to provide details requested in notices. The assessee claimed the notices were sent to a wrong email ID and had submitted all necessary documents with the application.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) properly rejected the registration application without verifying the charitable nature of the trust's activities and objects, and if notices were properly served.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A,Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE

Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

For Appellant: Smt. Akshata Rath – AR
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – DR
Hearing: 21/02/2024Pronounced: 23/02/2024

ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: There is a delay in filing appeal before this Tribunal. Assessee filed affidavit. On perusal of the affidavit, we are of the opinion that there is sufficient cause for delay. Accordingly, delay is condoned.

1.

1.1 This is an appeal e-filed by assessee against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), Pune under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 rejecting assessee’s application Paramarth Prabodhan Sanskrutik Seva Mandal [A] filed in Form No.10AB for registration under section 12AA of the Act.

2.

On perusal of the order of the ld.CIT(E) dated 21.10.2022, it is observed that the ld.CIT(E) has rejected the application of the assessee only on one ground that assessee failed to file details called-for vide notice dated 07.10.2022 and 25.08.2022. 2.1 The ld.Authorised Representative(ld.AR) of the assessee submitted that along with the Form No.10AB, the assessee had submitted copy of Trust Deed, copy of Audited Financials for the last three years along with Audit Report, copy of Registration under Society Registration Act. Ld.AR also submitted that the notices issued by ld.CIT(E) were not received by assessee as those notices were send on some wrong email id.

3.

The ld.Departmental Representative(ld.DR) for the Revenue supported the order of the ld.CIT(E).

4.

In this case, ld.DR has not denied that assessee had submitted copy of Trust Deed, Three Years Financial Audit Reports. The ld.CIT(E) has not made any remarks about the Trust Deed, Three Years Financials. At the time of granting registration, the 2 Paramarth Prabodhan Sanskrutik Seva Mandal [A] ld.CIT(E) has to look at the charitable nature of the objects and charitable nature of the activities. The ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption) has failed to verify these aspects, though the trust deed was on record and financials were on record. Be it as it may be, in the interest of justice, we set-aside the order of ld.CIT(E) for denovo adjudication to ld.CIT(E). The ld.CIT(E) shall provide opportunity to the assessee. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →