DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PMT BUILDING, PUNE vs. BARCLAYS GLOBAL SERVICE CENTRE PVT LTD, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Revenue sought permission to withdraw its appeal. The Tribunal granted this permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2009-2010. The appeal involved proceedings under Section 143(3) read with Section 92CA of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's request to withdraw its own appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE [VIRTUAL HEARING]
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI
BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.No.1207/PUN./2023 [E-APPEAL] Assessment Year 2009-2010 Barclays Global Service Centre Pvt. Ltd., 5 to 12 The DCIT, Circle-1(1), Floors, (Part) Bldg. G2, GERA PMT Bldg., Swargate, Commerzone SEZ, Survey vs. Pune – 411 037. No.65, Kharadi, Vadgaon Maharashtra. Sheri, Pune – 411 014. PAN AADCR6251L (Appellant) (Respondent) For Revenue : Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR For Assessee : -None- Date of Hearing : 27.02.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 28.02.2024 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :
This Revenue’s appeal, for assessment year 2009- 2010, arises against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-13, Pune, Pune’s order in Appeal No.PN/CIT(A)-13/ACIT, Company Cir.1(2), Chennai/2008-09/10108274/61, dated 27.09.2023, involving proceedings u/sec.143(3) r.w.s.92CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act").
Learned CIT-DR invited our attention to the department’s letter dated 22.11.2023 seeking permission for withdrawal of the instant appeal as under :
2 I.T.A.No. 1207/PUN./2023
We, therefore, dismiss the appeal of the Revenue as withdrawn in above terms. Ordered accordingly.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026