RAJESH DASHRATH SAWALE,KHARGHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANVEL
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “SMC” BENCH : PUNE [VIRTUAL HEARING]
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE “SMC” BENCH : PUNE [VIRTUAL HEARING] BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. /ITA No.28/PUN/2024 �नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2011-12
Rajesh Dashrath Sawale, Income Tax Officer, Flat No.05, 3rd Floor, Ward-2, Panvel Building B-30, Kendriya Vihar 3 CHSL, Sector-11, Kharghar, Panvel 410 209 vs. Maharashtra PAN : BYIPS2490H (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Assessee : Shri Rajesh S. Athavale For Revenue : Smt. Neha Deshpande
Date of Hearing : 13.03.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 26.03.2024 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12, arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short the “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058104306(1), dated 21.11.2023, involving proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
It emerges at the outset that learned NFAC has passed the lower appellate order ex parte whilst confirming the Assessing Officer’s action making section 69 unexplained investment addition of Rs.34,50,000/-.
2 ITA.No.28/PUN/2024 Rajesh Dashrath Sawale
The Revenue vehemently argued that the asssessee had been afforded
adequate opportunities of hearing in the lower appellate proceedings.
Ms. Deshpande fails to dispute the clinching fact that even if it is held that the
assessee has deliberately not appeared before the NFAC, there is no lower
appellate adjudication in tune with section 250(6) of the Act requiring framing
of points of determination followed by a detailed discussion thereupon. Faced
with this situation, I restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to NFAC for his
fresh appropriate adjudication in accordance with law, preferably within three
effective opportunities of hearing subject to rider that it shall be the taxpayer’s
onus only to plead and prove all facts with the relevant evidence(s) in
consequential proceedings.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 26.03.2024.
Sd/-- [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, Dated : 26th March, 2024 Satish Copy to : 1. The appellant 2. The respondent 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune concerned 4. D.R. ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File. / /By Order // // True copy // /Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Benches, Pune.
