RAJESH BHALCHANDRA GHARAT,NEW PANVEL vs. CIT(A), PANVEL

PDF
ITA 36/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 March 2024AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member)2 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “SMC” BENCH : PUNE [VIRTUAL HEARING]

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

Hearing: 14.03.2024Pronounced: 28.03.2024

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE “SMC” BENCH : PUNE [VIRTUAL HEARING] BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. /ITA No.36/PUN/2024 �नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2015-16

Rajesh Bhalchandra Gharat, Income Tax Officer, Flat No.102, P.No.120/131, Ward-1, Panvel Deepraj Building, B Wing, Raigad Sector-9, New Panvel, vs. Navi Mumbai – 410206 Maharashtra PAN : AGLPG5151B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Assessee : None For Revenue : Shri Sourabh Nayak

Date of Hearing : 14.03.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 28.03.2024 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16, arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short the “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1055923148(1), dated 11.09.2023, involving proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

2.

It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that the learned NFAC has passed its cryptic and totally non

2 ITA.No.36/PUN/2024 Rajesh Bhalchandra Gharat

speaking order; affirming the Assessing Officer’s impugned action, without

dealing with merits of the corresponding issues as contemplated u/s.250(6) of

the Act. Faced with this situation, the assessee’s substantive grounds pleaded

in the instant appeal are hereby restored to the NFAC for fresh appropriate

adjudication in accordance with law, preferably within three effective

opportunities of hearing subject to rider that it shall be the assessee’s onus

only to plead and prove all facts with the relevant evidence(s) in consequential

proceedings.

3.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 28th March, 2024

Sd/- [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, Dated : 28th March, 2024 Satish Copy to :

1.

The appellant 2. The respondent 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune concerned 4. D.R. ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File.

/ /By Order // //True Copy //

Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Benches, Pune.

RAJESH BHALCHANDRA GHARAT,NEW PANVEL vs CIT(A), PANVEL | BharatTax