HEIGHT INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-1, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the AO had already given effect to the CIT's order under Section 263 by accepting the assessee's contentions. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The CIT exercised revisionary powers under Section 263 and remanded issues to the AO for scrutiny. The AO subsequently passed an order giving effect to the CIT's direction, accepting the assessee's contentions.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee is infructuous given the subsequent actions of the AO in compliance with the CIT's revisionary order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri M.Balaganesh, & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
This appeal of the assessee is arising out of the order of the CIT, Kolkata-I, Kolkata dated 31-03-2014 for the assessment year 2009-10.
The CIT having exercised his revisionary power u/s. 263 of the Act has called for records of the assessment pertaining to the assessee for the assessment year under consideration. The CIT has remanded the issues raised in the notice dated 3-3-2014 for scrutiny and verification of the same as per law.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. -C-JM 1 M/s.Height Insurance Services Ltd
At the time of hearing before us the ld.DR submits that the AO has given effect to the order passed by the CIT u/s.263, wherein the AO has accepted the contentions of the assessee by his order.
In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed being infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed being infructuous. Order is pronounced in the open court on 23 - 06-2016
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026