Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B R BASKARAN & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
1 �ीम�त शेवता अनीश �बरावत Smt. Shweta Anish Birawat �ीम�त शेवता �करण �बरावत Smt. Shweta Kiran Birawat ITA No.4197/Mum/2013 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ई” �यायपीठ मुंबई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI �ी बी आर भा�करन, लेखा सद�य एवं �ी अिमत शु�ला, �याियक सद�य के सम� । BEFORE SHRI B R BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 4195/Mum/2013 (Assessment year 2005-06) ITA No. 4196/Mum/2013 (Assessment year 2006-07) �ीम�त शेवता अनीश �बरावत Vs Income-tax Officer 17(3)(4), Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug, Smt. Shweta Anish Birawat, Parel, 105/106, 305-306, B Block, Mumbai -400 033 Deepak Jyoti Tower, G D Ambedkar Marg, Kalachowki, Mumbai -400 033 स लेख �थयी.:PAN: AUBPS 7750 A अपीलाथ� (Appellant) ��यथ� (Respondent) Appellant by �ी अजय नागपाल Shri Ajay Nagpal : Respondent by : �ी ए के नायक Shri A K Nayak ITA No. 4197/Mum/2013 (Assessment year 2005-06) �ीम�त शेवता �करण �बरावत Vs Income-tax Officer 17(3)(4), Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug, Smt. Shweta Kiran Birawat, Parel, Mumbai -400 033 105/106, 305-306, B Block, Deepak Jyoti Tower, G D Ambedkar Marg, Kalachowki, Mumbai -400 033 स लेख �थयी.:PAN: AHHPB 8970 C अपीलाथ� (Appellant) ��यथ� (Respondent) Appellant by �ी अजय नागपाल Shri Ajay Nagpal : Respondent by : �ी ए के नायक Shri A K Nayak सुनवाईक�तार�ख /Date of Hearing : 13-04-2016 घोषणाक�तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 13-04-2016 आदेश ORDER 2 �ीम�त शेवता अनीश �बरावत Smt. Shweta Anish Birawat ITA No.4196/Mum/2013 �ीम�त शेवता �करण �बरावत Smt. Shweta Kiran Birawat ITA No.4197/Mum/2013 �ी अिमत शु�ला,�या.स :- PER AMIT SHUKLA, J. M.: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessees in relation to the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2005-06 and 2006-07 against separate impugned orders of even date, 13.03.2013 passed by CIT(A)-29 Mumbai. In all these appeals, the penalty has been levied on the addition made by treating the long term capital gain shown by the assessee on the sale of shares as ‘income from other sources’ by the AO.
Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that in the quantum appeal the matter has reached upto the Tribunal wherein this issue has been decided in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal vide order dated 20th February, 2015 in Bunch Appeals in the case of the assessee’s ITAs No.970, 971 and 976/M/2010. Once the issue has been decided in favour of the and addition stands deleted then penalty has no legs to stand.
The DR has also admitted that, in the quantum proceedings, this issue has been decided in favor of the assessee.
In view of the aforesaid fact that in the quantum proceedings the Tribunal has decided this issue in favour of the assessee and no addition now subsists, accordingly, the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) has no legs to stand and therefore, the penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) in all the appeals are deleted.
3 �ीम�त शेवता अनीश �बरावत Smt. Shweta Anish Birawat �ीम�त शेवता �करण �बरावत Smt. Shweta Kiran Birawat ITA No.4197/Mum/2013 5. In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 13th April, 2016.
Sd/- Sd/- (बी आर भा�करन) (अिमत शु�ला) लेखा सद�य �याईक सद�य (B R BASKARAN) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Date: 13th April, 2016 ��त/Copy to:- 1) अपीलाथ� /The Appellant. 2) ��यथ� /The Respondent. 3) The CIT(A) -29, Mumbai. 4) The Commissioner of Income Tax- 17, Mumbai. 5) �ितिनिध िवभागीय “ई”, अिधकरण अपीलीय आयकर, मुंबई/ The D.R. “E” Bench, Mumbai. 6) गाड�फाईल\ Copy to Guard File. /आदेशानुसारBy Order / / True Copy / /