ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION WELFARE CHARITABLE AND ENDOWMENT TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2041/CHNY/2014Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 April 2016AY 2010-114 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that for exemption under Section 11, income must be applied for charitable purposes. Since the assessee failed to provide material evidence of applying income for charitable activities, the claim was disallowed.

What were the facts?

The assessee trust, registered under Section 12AA, claimed exemption under Section 11 for income generated from a Kalyanamandapam taken on lease. The trust argued that profits were used for charitable activities.

What were the issues?

Whether income generated from a leased Kalyanamandapam is eligible for exemption under Section 11 when there is no proof of application of income for charitable activities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11,Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY

Hearing: 23.02.2016Pronounced: 01.04.2016

आदेश /O R D E R

PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VII, Chennai, dated 16.05.2014 and pertains to assessment year 2010-11.

2.

The only issue arises for consideration is with regard to claim of the assessee for exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act").

3.

Sh. R. Vijayaraghavan, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that the assessee-trust was registered under Section 12AA of the Act. The assessee was running a Kalyanamandapam and claimed exemption in respect of the income generated from the Kalyanamandapam. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee and the CIT(Appeals) has also confirmed the disallowance. Referring to the orders of the lower authorities, the Ld. counsel submitted that running of Kalyanamandapam cannot be a reason for not allowing the claim of the assessee. On a query from the Bench, the Ld. counsel clarified that the assessee took the Kalyanamandapam on lease and let out to people at large. With regard to application of income, the Ld. counsel clarified that the profit generated out of the income earned on letting out of Kalyanamandapam was used for charitable activities.

4.

On the contrary, Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the income of the assessee-trust shall be exempted under Section 11 of the Act provided the same is utilized for charitable activities. In the case before us, no expenditure was claimed towards charitable activities. In fact, no expenditure was incurred. The assessee has not produced any material before the authorities below for incurring expenditure for charitable activities. Since the assessee is running Kalyanamandapam, therefore, the assessee is not eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Act.

5.

We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. Section 11 of the Act provides for exemption in respect of the income of the trust which is applied for charitable purpose. Therefore, the income of the trust is exempted only if the same is applied for charitable nature. In the case before us, the assessee’s claim is that the Kalyanamandapam was taken on lease and generated income on letting out of the Kalyanamandapam. There is no material available on record to suggest that the assessee has applied any income for carrying out charitable activities in furtherance of its object. Since no material is available on record to suggest that any part of income of the assessee-trust was utilized for carrying out charitable activities, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the CIT(Appeals) has rightly confirmed the orders of the Assessing Officer, therefore, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the CIT(Appeals) and accordingly, the same is confirmed.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced on 1st April, 2016 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →