BHAGWAN SINGH,GHAZIABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's submissions and decided to restore the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order of the CIT(A) which confirmed an ex-parte assessment. The assessee argued that the assessment was made without jurisdiction and without observing principles of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment was made ex-parte without jurisdiction and adherence to principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘G’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld.
CIT(A) dated 19.02.2025 pertaining to A.Y 2012-13.
At the very outset, the ld counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessment has been made ex-parte and the ld. CIT(A) has wrongly confirmed the assessment order without examining whether the AO has complied with the mandatory conditions u/s 147 to 151 as envisaged under the Act. The ld AR stated that the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer as unexplained by recording incorrect facts and findings and without observing principles of natural justice. Therefore, it was prayed for restoring the matter to the ld. CIT(A) for deciding the issues afresh.
Per contra, the ld. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
We have heard the rival submissions and have perused the relevant material on record. In view of the facts and circumstances narrated above and in the interest of justice and fair play, we deem it fit to restore the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to decide the issues afresh after allowing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to provide necessary information /documents as required by the authorities. allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in open court on 13.10.2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026