DNYANGANGA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK BAHUUDDESHIYA MANDAL,NANDURA, BULDHANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 796/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 May 2024AY 2021-22Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)4 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT (Exemption) rightly rejected the assessee's application for 80G(5) registration. The assessee failed to fulfill the prerequisite conditions for the application, including providing necessary documentation.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust, applied for registration under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application, stating that the trust was neither registered under section 12AB nor approved under section 10(23C), and failed to provide a copy of its provisional approval.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee fulfilled the conditions for 80G(5) registration, particularly regarding prior registration/approval and submission of provisional approval documents.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5),Section 12AB,Section 10(23C)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE

Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE

For Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel
Hearing: 18.04.2024Pronounced: 07.05.2024

ORDER

PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 18.05.2023 passed by LD CIT, Exemption, Pune for the assessment year 2021-22.

2.

The appellant has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1] On the facts and circumstances of the case learned C.I.T. Exemption, Pune erred in rejecting Assessee’s Application dt. 05.11.2022 in Form 10AB under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide order dt. 18.05.2023. 2] Assessee-Trust was granted 80G(5) certificate by order of CIT Exemption Pune vide order dt. 17.10.2017 w.e.f. 10.11.2016 and Assessee was granted 80G(5) Certificate by Principal Comm. of I.T. Exemption, Pune vide provisional order dt. 09.07.2021 in Form 10AC after examining the genuineness of the Trust and it’s activities and it’s eligibility u/s. 80G(5). Thus on the same facts learned C.I.T. Exemption Pune was not justified in rejecting the Assessee’s application referred to above. 3] Learned C.I.T. Exemption Pune had wrongly and illegality rejected Assessee’s application for grant of 12A registration by his order dt. 28.04.2023 which is under challenge before ITAT vide appeal filed on 28.06.2023 and hence he equally erred in relying on the said illegal order for rejecting the present application u/s 80G(5) of I.T. Act, 1961. 4] Learned C.I.T. Exemption, Pune erred in observing that the Assessee failed to file provisional approval is not correct. The Assessee had filed all relevant document including Provisional Registration in Form 10AC u/s 80G(5) on 13.03.2023 in pursuance of notice dt. 04.03.2023.

5. Assessee craves leave to file additional grounds at the time of hearing as may be necessary.”

3. When the case of the appellant assessee was called for hearing, NONE appeared on behalf of the assessee. On earlier two occasions also when the appeal was fixed for hearing neither anybody appeared nor any application for adjournment was filed. Therefore, we proceed to decide the appeal on the basis of the material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR.

4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant assessee is a trust & its application dated 05-11-2022 in Form 10AB for registration u/s 80G(5) of the IT Act was rejected vide order dated 18-05-2023 by LD CIT(E), Pune by observing as under :-

“3.1 In the instant case it is noticed that the assessee is neither registered u/s 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac)(i) / 12A(1)(ac)(iii) nor approved u/s 10(23C) read with clause (i) / (iii) of first proviso to the said section and the case is not covered under the exclusions provided vide proviso to clause (i) of section 80G(5) of the Act. The assessee is also not a Regimental Fund or Non-Public Fund established by the amend forces of the Union for the welfare of the past and present members of such forces or their dependents. In fact, the application of the assessee in form No.10AB for registration u/s 12AB filed under the provisions of section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act has been rejected vide order dated 28/04/2023. Therefore, the condition (i) of section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not fulfilled in this case.

4.

Further, the provisions of clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act are applicable to a trust/ institution which is provisionally approved under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act. As per the provisions of Rule 11AA(2)(e) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, the copy of existing order of approval was required to be submitted along with the application itself. The assessee was also requested vide the notice dated 04/03/2023 to furnish such copy. However the assessee, neither submitted the copy of provisions approval along with the present application nor in response to the notice issued. Thus, the assessee has failed to comply despite giving ample opportunity. The non-submission of copy of order of provisional approval under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 establishes the fact that the prerequisite for application under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act for approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not fulfilled in this case.

5. In view of the above, the application filed by the assessee is hereby rejected without going into the merits of the case.”

5.

Considering the above facts as well as after hearing ld. DR, at length, we are of the considered opinion that the right of filing the appeal is granted by the Statute to the assessee-taxpayers and in this case, the assessee wanted to invoke the said right and paid the appeal fees in this regard conveying his seriousness of pursuing the appeal. However, the appellant chose not to appear before this

More judgments on Section 80G(5)

All 2,236 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →